In a recent meeting at the White House, President Donald Trump presented a controversial proposal to Jordan’s King Abdullah II, proposing that the United States assume control over the Gaza Strip. The plan involves relocating Gaza’s 2.2 million Palestinian residents to neighboring countries, including Jordan and Egypt, and transforming the area into a tourist destination called the “Riviera of the Middle East.” Trump emphasized that this initiative would not require U.S. financial commitments for development.
King Abdullah II firmly opposed the proposal, expressing concerns about stabilizing the region and the implications of moving a large influx of refugees. He reiterated Jordan’s stance against accepting further Palestinian refugees, highlighting the potential strain on the nation’s resources and community.
Despite the pushback, President Trump maintained that the U.S. would not withhold aid from Jordan and Egypt if they declined to participate in the resettlement plan. He stated, “I don’t have to threaten that. I do believe we’re above that.”
The proposal has sparked widespread debate, with critics arguing that forcibly relocating Gaza’s population establishes a violation of international law and could make tensions worse in the Middle East. Supporters claim that redeveloping Gaza under U.S. oversight could bring economic opportunities and stability to the region.
As further discussions unfold, the world watches with anticipation, fully aware that this plan could have extensive effects, and not just on the geopolitical landscape, but on the daily lives and future of millions of Palestinians.